Articles

Communicating Impact: 3 Cause Marketing Campaigns That Did ‘Good’

In USA on June 12, 2011 by Amira E. Tagged: , , ,

I’m all torn up about cause marketing these days. Not so much about whether it is good or bad. Anything done to benefit the development of humanity is innately good. More importantly, are corporations and their partnering non-profits doing enough to inform consumers about the impact of their contributions to cause marketing campaigns, including their purchases (e.g. Tide Loads of Hope), social media engagement (e.g. Giorgio Armani’s Acqua for Life), and voting (e.g. Pepsi Refresh)?

Supporting causes is no longer a trendy buzzword in the executive conference room. It has become an integral component of business strategy. Increasingly, consumers are expecting the brands they purchase from to be socially responsible and support environmental and humanitarian needs. 83% of Americans “wish more of the products, services and retailers they use would support causes,” as revealed in Cone’s 2010 Cause Evolution Study.

But we’re not satisfied with just knowing the brands we love support a cause. A staggering 90% of consumers (i.e. more than 278 million people in the U.S.) now want companies to tell them the ways they are benefiting a cause, the study reports. With the massive influx of cause clutter, consumers have naturally become cause-savvy. They want to know the specific impact the program will have on a cause: financial, social or environmental. And I expect that corporations will risk losing customers, and with it revenue, if they do not offer consumers the precise impact of their cause marketing campaigns.

Here is a closer look at how 3 cause campaigns are aiming to meet customer expectations by reporting results and impact:

1. American Express Members Project in partnership with Take Part

  • Background: This online initiative, launched in 2007, invites AmEx card members to submit and vote on ideas for humanitarian projects. Using tools like   In last year’s edition, $1.2 million was donated to 6 non-profit organizations.
  • Communicating Impact: On their Facebook page, AmEx outlines the winners and the amount donated to each. “Your votes made a big difference. Find out how charities are furthering their efforts with funding from American Express.” More impressively, last year’s winners each are featured in their own video posted on YouTube that details the impact of American Express’s donation. The following video communicates impact best, stating exactly how many people were helped and how.

Member’s Project Winner: Operation Smile

2. Downy Touch of Comfort in partnership with Quilts for Kids, Inc.

  • Background: In 2009, Downy launched a partnership with Quilts for Kids, Inc., to initiate this program that funds and facilitates the creation and delivery of quilts to kids in Children’s Miracle Network hospitals. Five cents per purchase of a specially-marked package directly benefited the cause.
  • Communicating Impact: Downy takes a markedly different approach to communicating the campaign’s impact to consumers. To date, the campaign has allowed for the creation of over 20,000 quilts to hospitalized children nationwide. Using the age-old and proven method of storytelling, Downy offers follow-up stories of children who have benefited from the gift of a quilt from Downy and Quilts for Kids. This approach offers consumers a genuine human connection to those impacted. On the flip side, the approach is heavily qualitative and may allow consumers to question the campaign’s financial impact.

Behind every quilt, there’s a story. Read more stories here.

3.    Pampers One Pack = One Vaccine in partnership with UNICEF

  • Background: Pampers and Unicef partnered to launch the “One Pack = One Vaccine” campaign in 2008, enlisting actress Salma Hayek as a spokesperson. Pampers would donate the cost of one tetanus vaccine (five cents) to UNICEF for every pack of specially-marked diapers and wipes purchased in the U.S. and Canada to help provide one tetanus vaccine to a pregnant woman or a woman of child-bearing age in the developing world.
  • Communicating Impact: Over 31 million vaccines were donated as a direct result of this campaign. Pampers used a simple math equation to demonstrate the impact of consumer purchases. The campaign’s success is visually portrayed on the campaign website, closing the loop.

Who did it best? Are these campaigns transparent in the way they communicate impact?

Is it enough to tell stories or do we want and need real, hard numbers to tell us how many lives were saved and impacted?

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Communicating Impact: 3 Cause Marketing Campaigns That Did ‘Good’”

  1. Great post. You took an approach that immediately offered a distinct point of view – sharing not only that more brands were using social media for cause marketing (which is relatively obvious) – but taking the next step and talking about how the truly successful brands may be the ones which manage to communicate the real impact of their efforts.

    You found three great examples, analyzed them and shared good visuals for each to bring them to life in a way that allowed people to see what you meant with each and get all of the context without needing to following links to learn more (though you still had the links as support in case anyone needed to see them or wanted more information)

    The only thing I would encourage you to do with a complete post like this is to take a stab at answering some of the questions that you ended with. When you find three examples and share something as authoritative as that, it seems like you have a point of view. Ending with a question can be great to generate discussion, but with a post like this the reader really wants to know what YOU think.

    Other than that small point, though, great post to start off for your first week on the class blog. (5)

  2. Thanks for the feedback! You’re right — I wasn’t as clear with my point of view as I thought I was. I feel very strongly about cause campaigns communicating impact throughout the duration of the campaign, but moreso at the end of the campaign. Too many times, the consumer is left hanging without any transparently communicated hard facts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: